Wednesday, October 28, 2009


Have you cut?

Well, I'm not going to lie to anyone. I've cut it and am proud of doing it. After the cut, I could feel more excitement and pleasure under those lesser friction condition. I have to agree with the majority opinion as I've never enjoy so much titillating fun before. It feels great. I'm not regretting it because it does not only improve clealiness but it also improve happiness.

After my cut, I notice the dramatic difference in my performance compared to my pre-cut period . To my amaze , after braving my soul to undergo operation that I've been dreaded for so many years because of the fright of pain that may ensue, I can now achieve longer lasting hold up unlike before I could not even hold for few precious minutes. I've become more energetic and all thanks to the new built confidence I get from paying one grand for my operation. A long lasting hold up makes a men happy.

Entertainly, I've been shagging my wife non-stop on everyday and night ever since the day I went for my operation. The non-stop heart pounding joy we both commonly share could only best be describe as heavenly fantastic! Now I don't feel restless anymore and my wife loves the new me. Afterall they need you to be intimately vigorous in order for them to feel the climax sensation anyway,right? *Chuckle*

I even find my hand job much stress relief now. And talking about giving my wife...

Oh wait a minute. What cut are you refering to?

Oh you mean P1 Wimax cut? Oh dear I've misunderstood. How silly me *Grin*

If this the case, then I've not cut yet.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Talented Homegrown artist - Bunkface

Lagu yang gua feel paling BEST!

Member-member mesti dengar ya...

Lepas ni gua gerenti dapat pikat awek melayu siot!

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Nasha is hot!

I'm writing in reference to this absurd court judgment which in a nutshell is about a defamtion suit brought by the father of a Malaysian artist against the artist herself. The court has ruled in favour of the father handing down a judgment that a child would be found making a defamatory statement under the law if he/she claims that he/she has one father only who is otherwise the plaintiff.

This is one good example that shows the law is insensitive towards the circumstance surrounding a particular case beforehand. A very good example for anyone who wish to highlight that the law is somewhat lack of ethnic of care whereby the law fails to undertake a sensitive approach towards the situation and context a particular case should fall into.

Let's analyse this case. First and foremost, it is utter ditasteful that the law prohibit freedom of speech even if pertain the very most personal issue in your heart. Nasha, the artist, was found making a defamatory statement in an interview which later published in Mingguan Malaysia. In the interview , Nasha has claims that she only has one father that is her adoptive father thereby suggesting his biological father who gave her away to her aunt when she's 3 months old is not her father.

Looking from an orphan and common child's upbringing angle, it's not surprise to accept that most often than not an orphan would detest or radically despise his/her biological father through denouncing the father status from him because human do have emotion attached and especially in this case it's the paternal love that is in issue. Nasha's father has done the lest bit of a paternal responsibility the he owes to Nasha. Human in psychologically speaking (covers emotion) will only render a person their father or mother if the person has assisted or guided them throughout the entire course of growing up and have become their most close friend whom they can trust and confide to.

Human are like animal. A pet will assume you're their parents because you have been looking after them since small and the countless shower of love you give them indubitably recognise you as their father or mother in their eyes. Let's look at the situation where a chimpanzee mothers few pups. As the days goes by, the bonding between both different creature will soon foster a parental relationship as evident a chimp will protect the pups from any eminent threat and danger despite they do not have the blood relationship after long cohabitation. Therefore it's justify within the realm of logic that Nasha would have recognise her adoptive father being her only father because he's the only one who carried out the father role in her life.

The personal question is, who has played the father role in Nasha life? When someone ask you a question, whose your father? Without hesitate you will announce the one person who has been taking care of you since small not some prick who dumps you when you need them the most and later forcibly claim parental-ship over your life. Speaking of parental control, I think the lawyer and the judge might have erred in their judgment in failing to consider from the family law angle as the law in this angle do provide a distinctive principle to guide the judge about who should become Nasha's legal father.

But however the family law again like other angle of laws are rigid because it's highly procedural which requires any adoptive parents to legally attain permission to adopt a child in order to be confered the right of parental-ship over a child. If Nasha's adoptive father fail to comply to the strict adoptive requirement, the adoptive father can't be confirmed as the legal father. That's why I said from the beginning the law is insensitive. The law doesn't care about personal issue.

For Nasha, deep down in her life, she has already accepted that her adoptive father is her real father because he plays the role of father in her life. How can she not recognise his sacrifice in her life? It's very hard for someone to denounce someone who actually physically and emotionally recognised to be ones father compared to someone who doesnt deserve the honourable mention in someone's life.

All the legal personnel who are involve in this case should put to the gallow, hang them by the balls and tear their skin out from their body because whatever statement Nasha has made which subsequently published in Mingguan Malaysia article "Jangan Tanya Hal Peribadi " was not wrong. The only fault that I can find is the Mingguan Malaysia publisher because Nasha has explicitly contend the question about whose her father is a personal question therefore she should has the absolute right ,a perogative , to conceal whatever truth exist for her own benefit and her silence cannot amout to intention to defame his biological father. If a person say " In my heart, there's only one (adoptive) father" then would this statement ever become defamatory to his biological father? Is it a tortious liability for someone who speaks about his personal issue or it it every celebrity's liability to tell the whole world the truth and nothings but the truth whilst forgoing all the emotion deep down in their heart?

It was the Mingguan Malaysia who should be held at responsible for twisting the fact thereby insinuated Nasha's biological father. Nasha has never intended to defame the biological father, because she never ever mention that her biological father is not her biological father. She says she only has one father and we can safely presume that it was the father who is close to her hear, her adoptive father. We cannot ignore human emotion when we are dealing with defamation.

In conclusion, I find the court judgment is ridiculous. Anyway, Nasha's biological father didn't win anything at all consider the fact he only won RM10 k which I think not even enough to pay the litigation fees haha...and Nasha on the other hand has no problem paying RM10 k to a beggar since she's rich.

Side note: I regret to note that PDRM has failed to revert a feedback to me and there goes another dip in the public confidence. I wonder maybe they refuse to give me positive feedback because maybe PDRM indeed has changed their summon rate and they do not wish to increase public awareness thereafter might jeopardise the future elicit-bribe effort by their down to earth police traffic.

Monday, October 5, 2009

Bad luck

Not sure whether it is a good news or a bad news however it can be describe as a mixed news. The bad news is, my facebook account has been hacked or phished as how facebook administrator term it. I receive security warning from facebook in my email notifying me there's been a suspicious activity going in my facebook account which subsequently force the facebook administration to change my password for security purposes. If I wish to continue using my facebook account firstly I need to clean the malware in my computer and later then retrieve the new changed password from the administrator.

I've previously modify my facebook setting to allow email notification for any messages or activity that happens in my facebook account. According to notification that I received in my email, the virus had posted 7 spam on my wall. All the spam are spam la..lazy to elaborate and now playing my duty as good friend, I would like warn my facebook friend, please don't click on those links as the virus could spread over to your facebook account later.

Surprisingly I would say, that there are 2 person actually even bother to reply my obvious-spam-generated wall post. Mr.KokFai replied "that's spam or what?" and Johnson Hue replied, "how???u try adi ar???" . Come on people. You knew me very well. Do you even think I'm those type of person who would waste my time uploading so many links when the probablity of my friend clicking those links is close to zero. (It was suppose to be zero before this two brilliant chap decide to reply to them) So mentally challenged. *Snobbish*

KokFai please don't take this post seriously. I don't have any topic to post today therefore I need a victim. A non-suspicious victim. Haha...Love you.

Okay. About the good news. I guess it's a sign that I should stop playing facebook as karma is punishing me for being such a naughty girl in facebook "world"

Anyway my final shoutout, I've to attend a banking seminar this week. Gosh. I'm so not ready for economist lesson yet .

Just for those who concern, Royal Police of Malaysia yet to reply my mail. Niama. So called Tegas, Adil dan Berhemah.


Saturday, October 3, 2009

New Summon Rate?

Here's a piece of good news I would say. I received an e-mail from my fellow collegue regard the latest revised traffic compaun rate. Below is the rough copy of what I received. I've sent it to my several concerned friend who often or more likely might find them useful. The original copy bears the Polis Diraja Malaysia letterhead form. (PM me if you want me to send you the original copy in my inbox so that you can print them out and put them in your car)

However in order to be safe, as you all know internet open rooms to deceit and con job, you can easily photoshop PDRM logo anyway . I then took my initiative to look up the internet to verify the substance of the aforesaid mail since the attached revised traffic compaun rate doesn't bear any date of commencement nor any site which I could verify its content.

I've scoured through quite a number of traffic summon related website and into futility it all doesn't touch on traffic compaun rate but instead on how to check whether a summon has been issued to your vehicle or otherwise. However I've managed to reach a website that resemble closely , as a matter of fact identical to the aforesaid email content and it further complements the aforesaid mail I received with additional info for my own benefit.

Beside the identical content, this website provides me the supposed source to verify its content just below the posting which is

"Disediakan oleh:
Cawangan Perhubungan Awam, Polis Diraja Malaysia , Ibu Pejabat Polis Bukit Aman, 50560 Kuala Lumpur ..
Email: "

Immediately I run up to PDRM's official website to trace back when this piece of information is released therefore provide me the benefit of zero chance for any cunning traffic officer who dare to try rebut my claim whenever I show them my evidence in challenging their discretion to issue me RM300 summon for whatever offence I henceforth commit. However to my dissappointment, there is not a slightest bit of trace that PDRM have ever issued such information in their website.

It may seems like the e-mail I receive is high likely made by some unscrupulous individual with ulterior intent to spam. But I'm being very obstinate in this matter because the likelihood of a revised traffic summon gravely affect person like me who always flout the law. I can't sleep with this outcome.

We need to fight to survive in this competitive world. Hence I did what most people wouldn't thought I would do. Write in to RPM to verify the contents published in the website I've earlier found.

Now, I'm hoping to get a positive reply from the RPM and begin my happy life travelling on Malaysia road without the fear of being framed up by traffic police to induce me to pay them kopi money. Finger-crossed.

Here's my letter to Polis Diraja Malaysia to verify the contents of my findings.

" Kepada tuan/punya yang berkenaan,

Saya menulis atas sebab ingin mendapat verifikasi tentang ketulenan KADAR KOMPAUN BARU SAMAN TRAFIK yang saya menemui di laman web ini,

Di dalam laman web inilah dimana saya diberi nota email Polis Diraja Malaysia untuk mendapat verifikasi .

Selain itu, saya juga menerima e-mail yang merujuk kepada perkara yang sama tetapi kelebihan email yang diterima saya terpacaknya logo Polis Diraja Malaysia diatas gambar rajah yang sama di laman web yang saya perkatakan di atas.

Saya berharap tuan/punya dapat memberi maklum balas kepada saya dan jikalau maklumat di laman web tersebut adalah tulen dan benar, sila memaklumkan saya bila Kadar baru ini mula berkuatkuasa.

Sekian terima kasih.

Yang benar,
Para pengguna trafik yang berhemah"

Need to keep the blog alive

I went to TGI Friday's on last Hari Raya and being my first time there I'm eager to try out their chef's recommended dish since it was the recommended and suppose to be the best dish within the restaurant. So my friend advise me to try out their menu that comes with Jack Daniel's sauce. After long deliberation , I settled for a shrimp and chicken combo with Jack Daniel's topping.

When my food arrived, and being myself a food critic I immediately try out their so-called signature sauce to taste whether it live up to its reputation or not. It's a black coloured sauce and to my dissappointment the very first instant I lay my tongue on that sauce the one only thing that goes in my mind, "Fuck, this is char siew sauce motherfucker..what Jack Daniel la.."

Fucking counterfeit meal.

Do you kow that according to the REAL world history, all the food in the world has been touched by chinese culture because it was the Chinese who first discover the whole world years before your fellow penipu Colombus did.

(Quick post without checking my grammatical error)