Fucking emo right now

Oh my fucking God! My condition is seriously deteriorating. My hair is falling bits by bits mutilating my very beloved head by DAY. Note the emphasise, "by DAY". Now, my forehead has became HIGHER and BROADER compared to previous memorable hairful year. It's so fugly now. I feel like I'm contracted with some kind of hair loss disease where bacteria eats up my hair cell . On top of that , as a corollary to my recently developed cacophobic characteristic, I further suffer a terrible repugnance .

Fortunately my fringe is long enough to conceal the vexing part of my *cough* good looking face *cough*. Despite this,my condition is yet disturbing to my own emotional detriment(psychology effect) to the extent only Yun Nam Hair Care could solve my problem . You may call this an emo or whatever. But for me, this catasrophe is tormenting and agonying painful. It's the mother of all disaster. It's like you've been forcefully shaved(thought of writing rape but it sound very obscenic) for no apparent reason.

It's really unpalatable to see I would go bald in my early years. I'm too young to die. Opps I mean to go bald.

I need to plant some hair damn it! Or else I'll go crazy. Lunatic as people called it.

Not another public holiday...

I can give you one bloody hell good reason why Thaipusam was suddenly made a national holiday after so many years it wasn't one.

The reason is simple. The MIC is frantically perceiving that the turnout at Batu Caves on Thaipusam will be exceptionally low compared with years before and the scintilla turnout figure will never augur well to reflect/ garner back the support MIC have previously lost to the infamous HINDRAF ( if you wish to call them as opposition , also can )as hearsay has urged dissident Indian not to celebrate Thaipusam as a form of protest against MIC. With the move to make Thaipusam a public holiday, Indians have no reason not to come to celebrate since they no longer can use the excuse " Busy la...need to work.screw thaipusam". Then the Thaipusam celebration on the coming Wednesday can be used as a stratagem to clear the air that no ones going to attend Batu Cave annual celebration as a form of protest against MIC.

Indian's support towards the self-proclaimed ultimate protector of Indian community ,MIC, has fallen dramatically after the unexpected uproar of HINDRAF last month. In a stance of that further mar MIC's image in the eyes of Indian community after it fails to stand up for several Hindu temple demolition and keeping promise to secure Indian's welfare in our economy, Datuk Samy Vellu , the on-going President of MIC ( you may call him Datuk Bulu if you like ) blatantly swep aside the "unsubstantial" allegation and head on bashing HINDRAF's motive and suggest they were manipulated by the opposition party instead of accede to his failure to act for his own ethnicity.

Samy Vellu's political days could well be numbered. With a recent slap in his face on live telecast, I doubt he could survive after GE12.

Please...stop dreaming

Thanks for fixing my collar while I tuck into my brunch the other day. It was thoughtful and lovely of you to notice such minor details on me. Although I don't look that swanky anymore with the collar down(note:uber vain), however I'm appreciative with your caring heart that subsequently moves my heart. If you would do it again for a second time, I would have fall in love with you instantly. Seriously *sarcasm*

Top 10 conspiracy theories

1. 9/11 was planned by the US government.

Many conspiracy theories have been presented concerning the September 11,2001 attacks, many of them claiming that President George W. Bush and/or individuals in his administration knew about the attacks beforehand and purposefully allowed them to occur because the attacks would generate public support for militarization, expansion of the police state, and other intrusive foreign and domestic policies by which they would benefit.

Proponents point to the Project for the New American Century, a conservative think tank that argues for increased American global leadership, whose former members include ex-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney and several other key Bush administration figures. An 1990 report from the group stated that "some catastrophic and catalyzing event- like a new Pearl Harbor" would needed to budge public opinion in their favor.

2. UFO recovered at Roswell


The Roswell UFO incident involved the recovery of materials near Roswell, New Mexico, USA, in July 1947, which have since become the subject of intense speculation, rumor, questioning and research. There are widely divergent views on what actually happened, and passionate debate about what evidence can be believed. The United States military maintains that what was recovered was a top-secret research ballon that had crashed.

By the early 1990s, UFO researchers such as Friedman, William Moore, Karl Pflock, and the team of Kevin Randle and Don Schmitt had interviewed several hundred people who has, or cliamed to have had, a connection with the events at Roswell in 1947. Additionally, hundreds of documents were obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests, aw were some apparently leaked by insiders, such as disputed " Majestic 12" documents. Their conclusions were that at least one alien craft had crashed in the Roswell vicinity, that aliens, some possibly still alive, were recovered, and that a massive cover-up of any knowledge of the incident was put in place.

Link

3. John F. Kennedy's Assasination


The assasination of John F. Kennedy , the thirty-fifth President of United States, took place on Friday, November 22,1963, in Dallas, Texas, USA at 12.30pm CST(18:30 UTC). Kennedy was fatally wounded by gunshots while riding with his wife Jacqueline in a presidential motorcade through Dealey Plaze. The official investigation by the Warren Commission was conducted over a ten-month period, and its report was published in September 1964. The Commission concluded that the assassination was carried out solely by Lee Harvey Oswald, an employee of the Texas School Book Depository in Dealey Plaza.

A number of conspiracy theories exist with regard to the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy . Such theories began to be generated soon after his death, and continue to be proposed today. Many of these theories propose a criminal conspiracy involving parties such as Federal Reserve, the Central Intelligence Agency(CIA), the KGB, the Mafia, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director J. Edgar Hoover, Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, Fidel Castro, George H.W. Bush, Cuban exile groups opposed to the Castro government and the military and/or government interest of the United States.

4. Global Warming is a fraud.


The suggestion of a conspiracy to promote the theory of global warming was put forward in a 1990 documentary The Greenhouse Conspiracy broadcast by Channel Four in the United Kingdom on 12 August 1990, as part of the Equinox series, which asserted that scientise critical of global warming theory were denied funding.

William Gray, phD (a pioneer in the science of hurricane forecasting) has made a list of 15 reasons for the global warming hysteria. The lists includes the need to come up with an enemy after the end of Cold War, and the desire among scientists , government leaders and environmentalists to find a political cause that would enable them to 'organize,propagandize, force conformity and exercise political influence. Big world government could best lead (and control) us to a better world!' In this article, Gray also cites the ascendancy of Al Gore to the vice presidency as the start of his problems with the federal funding. According to him, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration stopped giving him research grants, and so did NASA.

5. Princess Diana was murdered by the royal family.


In 1997, Priness Diana(Princess of Wales) and Dodi Fayed (son of Mohamed Fayed, owner of the Ritz Hotel and Harrods) were killed in a car accident while trying to get away from the press photographers in Paris. The scandal surrounding their relationship (DOdi was Muslim whilst Diana was the mother of the future head of the Church of England) has led many people to speculate that they were actually killed in order to prevent further scandal to the throne of England.

Polls suggest that around a quarter of UK public, and a majority of people in some Arab countries, believe that there was a plot to murder DIana, Princess of Wales. Motivations which have been advanced for such a conspiracy include suggestions that DIana intended to marry Dodi Fayed, that she intended to convert to Islam, that she was pregnant, and that she was to visit the holy land. Organizations which conspiracy theorists suggest are responsible for her death have included French Intelligence, the British Royal Family, the press, the British Intelligence service MI5 or MI6, the CIA, Mossad, the Freemasons, or the IRA.

6. Jewish world domination

This theory, in recent history, extends mainly from the booklet. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which are widely considered to be the beginning of the contemporary conspiracy theory literature. The Protocols are considered by some to be an anti-Jewish literacy forgery that purports to describe a Jewish plot to archieve world domination. Numerous independent investigation have repeatedly proven it to be a plagiarism and a hoax, yet numerous independent investigations have shown it to be a factual document.

The text was popularized by hose proposed to Russian revolutionary movement, and was disseminated further after the revolution of 1905, becoming known worldwide after the 1917 October Revolution. It was widely circulated in the West in 1920 and thereafter. Th Great Depression and the rise of Nazism were important developments in the history of the Protocols.

7. Apollo moon landing hoax.


Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations are claims that some or all elements of the Apollo Moon landings were faked by NASA and possibly members of other involved organizations. Some groups and individuals have advanced alternate historical narratives which tend, to varying degrees, to state that the Apollo Astronauts did not land on the moon, and that NASA created and continues to perpetuate this hoax.

Moon hoax proponents devote a substantial porption od their efforts to examining NASA photos. They point to various issues with photograhps and films purportedly taken on the Moon. Experts in photography (even those unrelated to NASA) respond that the anomalies, while sometimes counterintuitive, are in fact precisely what one would expect from a real Moon landing, and contrary to what would occur with manipulated or studio imagery. Hoax proponents also state that whistleblowers may have deliberately manipulated the NASA photos in hope of exposing NASA.

8. Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen.


This theory states that Pesident Roosevelt (FDR) provoked the attack, knew about it in advance and covered up his failure to warn the Hawaiian commanders. FDR needed the attack to sucker Hitler to declare war, since the public and Congress were overwhelmingly against entering the war in Europe. It was his backdoor to war.

Theorists believe that US was warned by, at least, the governments of Britain, Netherlands, Australis, Peru, Korea and the Soviet Union that a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor was coming. All importang Japanese codes were broken. FDR and Marshall and others knew the attack was coming, allowed it and covered up their knowledge.

9. The Third Secret of Fatima.


The Three Secrest of Fatima are said to be three prophecies that were given by an apparition of the Blessed Virgin Mary to three young Portuguese shepherds, Lucia Santos and her cousins Jacinta and Francisco Marto. From May to October, 1917, the three children claimed to have witnessed this Marian apparition, which is today popularly described as Our Lady of Fatima. On July 13 the Virgin Mary is said to have entrusted the three secrets - in the form of prophecies - to the young visionaries. Two of the secrests were revealed in 1941 in a document written by Lucia to assist with the canonization of her cousins, while the third was to remain secret, although the bishop of Leiria commanded Lucia to put it in writing and to present it to the Pope.

A Catholic priest who has apprently seen the original text of the "third secret" of Fatima disputes the official interpretation of the secret released by the Vatican. Furthermore, he has asked key people in the Vatican about the text and has gotten no response. WHile the Priest's comments are somewhat radical, they are not without merit, as he has seen the secret with his own eyes. Moreover, while the first 2 secrest are fairly obvious and clear, leading some to wonder why the third one is required to be examined by a team of experts because of its complexity.

10. The Philadelphia Experiment



The Philadelphia Experiment was an alleged naval military experiment at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, somestimes around the date of October 28, 1943, in which the US destroyer escort USS Eldridge was to be rendered invisible to human observers for a brief period of time. It is also referred to as Project Rainbow. The stroy is widely regarded as a hoax. The US NAvy has stated that the experiment never occured, and furthermore, details of the story contradict stated facts about the Eldridge. It has nonetheless caused a significant ripple effect in many conspiracy theory circles, and elements of the Philadelphia Experiment are featured in many other government conspiracy theories.

According to some accounts, the experiment was conducted by a Dr. Franklin Reno (or Rinehart) as a militray application of a Unified Field Theory. The theory, briefly, postulates the interrelated nature of the forces that comprise electromagnetic radiation and gravity. Through a special application of the theory, it was thought possible, with specialized equipment and sufficient energy, to bend light around an object in such a way as to render it essentially invisible to observers. The Navy considered this application of the theory to be of obvious military valuer (especially as the United States was engaged in World War 2 at the time) and both approved and sponsored the experiment. A navy destroyer escort, the USS Eldridge, was fitted witht eh required equipment at the naval yards in Philadelphia.

(The bell pictorial above was featured in National Treasure 1)

Source.


Some conspiracy you might find equally intersting.
Titanic, Jesus, The New World Order, AIDS.

And few conspiracy webpages compile a myraid of rhetoric conspiracy theory that you never thought it was a mis-information on the part of powerful whim.
ConspiracyPlanet and Carpenoctem and of course wikipedia

Mercedes CSL

I know whose the dalang behind Chua Soi Lek's downfall!!!!

Not going to publish his name in my blog for safety purposes. Just drop me a message on MSN if you're eager to know who.

For those people who still hooked with CSL sex scandal issue, please drop it out of your mind will ya. That sex tape gurantee won't titillate any of your erotic-foreplay mind because the video doesn't consist any foreplay act but it could gives you nightmares. Nothing much to anticipate out of that wrinkle manhooded stud but if you really really want to know the details of the video , glean from the testimonial those who had watched it, pre-dominantly Johorian women (Yes, WOMEN.women are more eager to know what that old fart has beneath his underpants) that his little brother is compatible with a horse's.

Freaky? I'm barfing already.

Ah-Ha

Ah-Ha is recognisable being the best local comedy TV series ever made. It's prestige undubitably supercede the over-rated Senario that predominantly only captures Malay audience for its utterly lame comic acting and self-depicting humor. On the contrary, Ah-Ha is a show hosted by a group comprising of talented new artist such as Afdlin Shauki and Harith Iskandar who has built themself a career in local stage performance such as The Actor Studio for their creativity in acting and most importantly wittiness in conveying their views.

Try to enjoy few of the clips below. ( Sorry for such a short post. Was in a hurry)

Anglo-American ambitions behind the assassination of Benazir Bhutto and destabilization of Pakistan

By Larry Chin
Online Journal Associate Editor


Dec 31, 2007, 01:15

It has been known for months that the Bush-Cheney administration and its allies have been manuevering to strengthen their political control of Pakistan, paving the way for the expansion and deepening of the “war on terrorism” across the region. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto does not change this agenda. In fact, it simplifies Bush-Cheney’s options.

Seeding chaos with a pretext

“Delivering democracy to the Muslim world” has been the Orwellian rhetoric used to mask Bush-Cheney’s application of pressure and force, its dramatic attempt at reshaping the Pakistani government (into a joint Bhutto/Sharif-Musharraf) coalition, and backdoor plans for a military intervention. Various American destabilization plans, known for months by officials and analysts, proposed the toppling of Pakistan's military.

The assassination of Bhutto appears to have been anticipated. There were even reports of “chatter” among US officials about the possible assassinations of either Pervez Musharraf or Benazir Bhutto, well before the actual attempts took place.

As succinctly summarized in Jeremy Page’s article, "Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? The Main Suspects", the primary suspects are 1) “Pakistani and foreign Islamist militants who saw her as a heretic and an American stooge," and 2) the Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, a virtual branch of the CIA. Bhutto’s husband Asif Ali Zardari directly accused the ISI of being involved in the October attack.

The assassination of Bhutto has predictably been blamed on “Al-Qaeda,” without mention of fact that Al-Qaeda itself is an Anglo-American military-intelligence operation.

Page’s piece was one of the first to name the man who has now been tagged as the main suspect: Baitullah Mehsud, a purported Taliban militant fighting the Pakistani army out of Waziristan. Conflicting reports link Mehsud to “Al-Qaeda,” the Afghan Taliban, and Mullah Omar (also see here). Other analysis links him to the terrorist A.Q. Khan.

Mehsud’s profile, and the reporting of it, echoes the propaganda treatment of all post-9/11 “terrorists." This in turn raises familiar questions about Anglo-American intelligence agency propaganda involvement. Is Mehsud connected to the ISI or the CIA? What did the ISI and the CIA know about Mehsud? More importantly, does Mehsud, or the manipulation of the propaganda surrounding him provide Bush-Cheney with a pretext for future aggression in the region?

Classic “war on terrorism” propaganda

While details on the Bhutto assassination continue to unfold, what is clear is that it was a political hit, along the lines of US agent Rafik Harriri in Lebanon. Like the highly suspicious Harriri hit, the Bhutto assassination has been depicted by corporate media as the martyring of a great messenger of Western-style “democracy." Meanwhile, the US government’s ruthless actions behind the scenes have received scant attention.

The December 28 New York Times coverage of the Bhutto assassination offers the perfect example of mainstream Orwellian media distortion that hides the truth about the Bush-Cheney agenda behind blatant propaganda smoke. This piece echoes White House rhetoric proclaiming that Bush’s main objectives are to “bring democracy to the Muslim world” and “force out Islamist militants."

In fact, the openly criminal Bush-Cheney administration has only supported and promoted the antithesis of democracy: chaos, fascism, and the installation of Anglo-American friendly puppet regimes.

In fact, the central and consistent geostrategy of Bush-Cheney, and their elite counterparts around the world, is the continued imposition and expansion of the manufactured “war on terrorism”; the continuation of war across the Eurasian subcontinent, with events triggered by false flag operations and manufactured pretexts.

In fact, the main tools used in the “war on terrorism” remain Islamist militants, working on behalf of Anglo-American military intelligence agencies -- among them, “Al-Qaeda," and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, the ISI. Mehsud fits this same profile.

Saving Bush-Cheney’s Pakistan

In an amusing quote from the same New York Times piece, Wendy Chamberlain, former US ambassador to Pakistan (and a central figure behind multinational efforts to build a trans-Afghan pipeline, connected to 9/11), proudly states: “We are a player in the Pakistani political system."

Not only has the US continued to be a “player," but one of its top managers for decades. Each successive Pakistani leader since the early 1990s -- Bhutto, Sharif and Musharraf -- have bowed to Western interests. The ISI is a virtual branch of the CIA.

While Musharraf has been, and remains, a strongman for Bush-Cheney, questions about his “reliability," and control -- both his regime’s control over the populace and growing popular unrest, and elite control over his regime -- have driven Bush-Cheney attempts to force a clumsy (pro-US, Iraq-style) power-sharing government. As noted by Robert Scheer, Bush-Cheney has been playing “Russian roulette” with Musharraf, Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif -- each of whom have been deeply corrupt, willing fronts for the US.

The return of both Bhutto and the other former prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, has merely been an attempt by the US to hedge its regional power bets.

What exactly were John Negroponte and Condoleeza Rice really setting up the past few months?

Who benefits from Bhutto’s murder?

The “war on terrorism” geostrategy and propaganda milieu, the blueprint that has been used by elite interests since 9/11 to impose a continuing world war, is the clear beneficiary of the Bhutto assassination. Bush-Cheney and their equally complicit pro-war/pro-occupation counterparts in the Democratic Party enthusiastically support the routine use of “terror” pretexts to impose continued war policies.

True to form, fear, “terrorism," “security” and military force are, once again, the focuses of Washington political rhetoric, and the around-the-clock media barrage.

The 2008 US presidential candidates and their elite campaign advisers, all but a few of whom enthusiastically support the “war on terrorism," have taken turns pushing their respective versions of “we must stop the terrorists” rhetoric for brain-addled supporters. The candidates whose polls have slipped, led by 9/11 participant and opportunist Rudy Guiliani, and hawkish neoliberal Hillary Clinton, have already benefited from a new round of mass fear.

Musharraf benefits from the removal of a bitter rival, but now must find a way to re-establish order. Musharraf now has an ideal justification to crack down on “terrorists” and impose full martial law, with Bush-Cheney working from the shadows behind Musharraf and continuing to manipulate or remove his apparatus if Musharraf proves too unreliable or broken to suit Anglo-American plans.

The likely involvement of the ISI behind the Bhutto hit cannot be overstated. ISI’s role behind every major act of “terrorism” since 9/11 remains the central unspoken truth behind current geopolitical realities. Bhutto, but not Sharif or Musharraf would have threatened the ISI’s agendas.

Bhutto, militant Islam, and the pipelines

Now that she has been martyred, many unflattering historical facts about Benazir Bhutto will be hidden or forgotten.

Bhutto herself was intimately involved in the creation of the very “terror” milieu purportedly responsible for her assassination. Across her political career, she supported militant Islamists, the Taliban, the ISI, and the ambitions of Western governments.

As noted by Michel Chossudovsky in America’s “War on Terrorism," it was during Bhutto’s second term that Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) and the Taliban rose to prominence, welcomed into Bhutto’s coalition government. It was at that point that ties between the JUI, the Army and the ISI were established.

While Bhutto’s relationship with both the ISI and the Taliban were marked by turmoil, it is clear that Bhutto, when in power, supported both -- and enthusiastically supported Anglo-American interventions.

In his two landmark books, Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia and Jihad:The Rise of Militant Islam in Central Asia, Ahmed Rashid richly details the Bhutto regime’s connections to the ISI, the Taliban, “militant Islam," multinational oil interests, and Anglo-American officials and intelligence proxies.

In Jihad, Rashid wrote: “Ironically it was not the ISI but Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, the most liberal, secular leader in Pakistan’s recent history, who delivered the coup de grace to a new relationship with Central Asia. Rather than support a wider peace process in Afghanistan that would have opened up a wider peace process in Afghanistan, Bhutto backed the Taliban, in a rash and presumptuous policy to create a new western-oriented trade and pipeline route from Turkmenistan through southern Afghanistan to Pakistan, from which the Taliban would provide security. The ISI soon supported this policy because its Afghan protégé, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, had made no headway in capturing Kabul, and the Taliban appeared to be strong enough to do so.”

In Taliban, Rashid provided even more historical detail: “When Bhutto was elected as Prime Minister in 1993, she was keen to open a route to Central Asia. A new proposal emerged backed strongly by the frustrated Pakistani transport and smuggling mafia, the JUI and Pashtun military and political officials.”

“The Bhutto government fully backed the Taliban, but the ISI remained skeptical of their abilities, convinced that they would remain a useful but peripheral force in the south.”

“The US Congress had authorized a covert $20 million budget for the CIA to destabilize Iran, and Tehran accused Washington of funneling some of these funds to the Taliban -- a charge that was always denied by Washington. Bhutto sent several emissaries to Washington to urge the US to intervene more publicly on the side of Pakistan and the Taliban.”

Bhutto’s one mistake: she vehemently supported the pipeline proposed by Argentinian oil company Bridas, and opposed the pipeline by Unocal (favored by the US). This contributed to her ouster in 1996, and the return of Nawaz Sharif to power.

As noted by Rashid: “After the dismissal of the Bhutto government in 1996, the newly elected Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his oil minister Chaudry Nisar Ali Khan, the army and the ISI fully backed Unocal. Pakistan wanted more direct US support for the Taliban and urged Unocal to start construction quickly in order to legitimize the Taliban. Basically the USA and Unocal accepted the ISI’s analysis and aims -- that a Taliban victory in Afghanistan would make Unocal’s job much easier and quicken US recognition.”

Her appealing and glamorous pro-Western image notwithstanding, Bhutto’s true record is one of corruption and accommodation.

The “war on terrorism” resparked

Every major Anglo-American geostrategic crime has been preceded by a convenient pretext, orchestrated and carried out by “terror” proxies directly or indirectly connected to US military-intelligence, or manipulated into performing as intelligence assets. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto is simply one more brutal example.

This was Pakistan’s 9/11; Pakistan’s JFK assassination, and its impact will resonate for years.

Contrary to mainstream corporate news reporting, chaos benefits Bush-Cheney’s “war on terrorism." Calls for “increased worldwide security” will pave the way for a muscular US reaction, US-led force and other forms of “crackdown” from Bush-Cheney across the region. In other words, the assassination helps ensure that the US will not only never leave, but also increase its presence.

The Pakistani election, if it takes place at all, is a simpler two-way choice: pro-US Musharraf or pro-US Sharif.

While the success of Bush-Cheney’s 9/11 agenda has met with mixed results, and it has met with a wide array of resistance (“terroristic” as well as political), there is no doubt that the propaganda foundation of the “war on terrorism” has remained firm, unshaken and routinely reinforced.

As for Nawaz Sharif, who now emerges as the sole competitor to Musharraf, he, like Musharraf and Bhutto, is legendary for his accommodation to Anglo-American interests -- pipelines, trade, and the continued US military presence. As Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie noted in their book, Forbidden Truth, the October 1999 military coup led by Musharraf that originally toppled Sharif’s regime was sparked by animosity between the two camps, as well as “Sharif’s personal corruption and political megalomania," and “concerns that Sharif was dancing too eagerly to Washington’s tune on Kashmir and Afghanistan."

In other words, Bush-Cheney wins, no matter which asset winds up on the throne.

Source