Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Kalah...

Today I came back home from office and got a shock of my life.

All the books in my room all vanished and they are no where to be found but upon further inspection at the crime scene it came to my relieve that it was just part of my family's pre-cny house-keeping. As usual my mom will get the maid to clean our rooms and while at it, she ask the maid to hide all of my books. This apply to all the rooms in the house. Chinese has this taboo that there must not be any books visible on sight during cny because books in chinese is pronounce as "shu" which bears a striking similarity with the word losing. Hence the taboo.

To be reminded that all chinese people are money-minded and on top of that, naturally borned kiasu, so therefore the chinese people would then self-advised to avoid touching any books and it's better if you don't get to see(in sight) them completely, the "evil books", from lurking around during the auspicious month of prosperity. During cny we invite prosperity into our house but not chase them away. Karma if you do that.

Anyway, just for a simple updates. I'm currently reading this book.


Was actually intend to get a book that disclose in brief all the mode of scam available in the market but it was sold out. Damn

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

My 3 sen

On last Saturday, I helped my mom to refill her car fuel at nearby petrol station. She gave me RM50 and I paid them at the petrol station cashier in full sum with intend to fill up the tank to its fullest.

The pump machine( I don't whats the correct term for it) only capable of register RM46.03 as the highest amount payable for my full tank. I was in the midst of rushing to my friends house and without further hesitate I went over to the cashier to collect my balance payment. I tell myself, probably they won't charge me the additional 3 sen since its a trivial amount and the goverment have introduced the "amalan membundarkan setiap bayaran" part of the enchancement of our economy. However, as the cashier cash out, the cash machine indicate they are going to charge me exactly what's stated on the pump machine and the balance return would be RM3.97.

I was dissapointed as I don't get to enjoy a 3 sen waiver but I was fine with it since understood you're suppose to pay for what you've consumed. As the cashier hand over the balance to me and the moment I count the balance returned, I blew my top off.

He gave me RM3.90.

RM3.90!!

He gave me RM3.90 instead of RM3.97. I was like WTF. Immediately with my frust I rebuked and protested to the cashier for being unreasonable. How can you give me RM3.90 when you are suppose to pay me RM3.97. To be fair, if you don't have 7 sen to return to me then don't charge me 3 sen in the first place. Bloody hell. I almost throw my tantrum but luckily the cashier is co-operative and accede to my request and return RM4 as a compromise or else I don't know what kind of drama could take place.


Thank goodness, I walked away as a happy man and 3 sen richer.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Impotency

Since when Kenny Lee has this secondary job? Sell new product also didn't recommend to his buddies. Sial punya budak.


Anyway, viagra is so twentith century. Now the most in-thing for vitality is PORK!!





BUENOS AIRES (Reuters) – Argentina's president recommended pork as an alternative to Viagra Wednesday, saying she spent a satisfying weekend with her husband after eating barbecued pork.

"I've just been told something I didn't know; that eating pork improves your sex life ... I'd say it's a lot nicer to eat a bit of grilled pork than take Viagra," President Cristina Fernandez said to leaders of the pig farming industry.

She said she recently ate pork and "things went very well that weekend, so it could well be true."

Argentines are the world's biggest per capita consumers of beef, but the government has sought to promote pork as an alternative in recent years due to rising steak prices and as a way to diversify the meat industry.

"Trying it doesn't cost anything, so let's give it a go," Fernandez said in the televised speech.

Source

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Bukit Tinggi Part 1

My trip to Bukit Tinggi on last Christmas is relaxing and enjoyable at the same time. No doubt credits has to give to the company whom I went with. Anyway I will let the pictures do most of the talking since nowadays it’s the laziest trend in blogosphere to convey pictorial message rather than written message.



We were at the horse table where entrance fee chargable is as cheap as RM5. Patrons who wish to have a way with the horse, opps I mean who wish to ride the horse, need to pay RM25 per 10 minute ride. Cheap and reasonable. Though the ride always end up no less than 30 minutes but it's still rather cheap as how often do you get to ride a horse? Bring your loves there someday and gallop together with them. The experience you archieve is value for money.


Just look at how this young man enjoys getting a private lick from the horse(punt is strongly intended) Voyeur betul



A horse is taller than a 4WD.


The two macho fella promoting Colmar Tropicana just before the entrance to French Village.

There are some private photos of mine that cannot be publish here such as the one captures me imitating other tourist pose for the camera which I fail terribly and end up being laughed at.




Nah..just trying out the camera's longshot capability. No other ulterior motive behind this.


The infamous wishing well where the above girls in blue formerly stood at. This well is as dirty as our Klang river for Christ sake.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

9/11 resurface in Malaysia

Damn. Malaysiakini beats me to it. I was going to ask the same question when Dr.Mahathir comes out of the closet and accede that 9/11 was a staged attack. Actually the issue of whether 9/11 is a staged attack has long been concurred by the majority of well-informed US citizen that it's indeed a self-inflicted wound just to invoke a reason to go for war and they can't do anything about it. Just like The Pearl Habour. The video Dr.Mahathir was referring to when making the public statement has appeared in the net for more than 6 years now . This comes to show that Dr.M was only recently an internet savvy. The mentioned video can easily be found in video google.

If Dr. M accede that 9/11 can be staged provided you have the right resources, then the same goes to Anwar's trial or even the pre-meditated Church arsonic attack. Who has the powerful resources to ensure such drama can be carried out so diligently without flaw in the naked eyes? If you're in control of the army and police, not to forget has a hidden hand behind every mainstream media that's pivotal to propagate an ideology that only favours the whims and powerful , no doubt with such confered power you can pratically do anything you want at any scale ,be it benevolent or manevolent, and no one can do anything about it. The judiciary is your puppet.

If Dr.M accedes that conspiracy theories somewhat carry substantial weigh to explain a phenomena then this would mean the conspiracy about some fella bombing a Mongolian interpreter after he refuse to pay out the agreed commision over the purchase of submarine to the interpreter should also carry the similar weight as 9/11 conspiracy.

What is a conspiracy theory you may ask? Conspiracy theory is an explanation made out from a bulk of evidence that has connecting dots among them and it reveals the hidden truth behind what is actually potrayed.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Nothing to shout about, really

This decision is plain stupid. On my intial reading of the news, I thought it's something to be praised of since it's explicitly propagated by the media that the highest court in the land has finally make a decade wrong a right. However upon my further analyse and observation, it appears the decision is not as good as it sounds like in the newspaper.

The Federal Court has overruled a previous decision from the same court whereby now onwards, it's illegal to purchase a property from a person who is not the rightful owner of the property. This completely undermine and ridicule our Queen's most sensical principle, a bona fide person shall never be penalise for the wrong that he's not aware of. Under the Queen's law of equity, one who comes in bad faith shall never profit from his own wrong. Everyone knows this and God know this as well.

Just to give all and sundry a thumb sketch of the law prior to the abovesaid absurd decision, if you follow the Queen's law closely, if a thief steal an item lets say a handphone, and subsequently sells it to an innocent buyer who has come in good faith in believing that the handphone is not a stolen property but reasonably believe it's the thief's property, the buyer shall not be regard as stealing or handling a stolen property and is not compelled by the law to return the goods to its rightful owner because you have now became the new rightful owner.

However if the situation is otherwise, where the buyer is aware that the handphone is a stolen property and yet he proceed with purchase of the handphone then he will subsequently be regard to have appropriate a stolen property as he is completely aware of the status quo of the property , that it's a stolen goods, and the law compels you to return the stolen property to its rightful owner since you're not the rightful owner. I will draw a simple example on how bad faith should works. The simplest would be to purchase a pirated DVDs. Whoever purchase a pirated DVDs are actually commiting bad faith as they purchase something that they knew is a stolen property in the first place. Hence you're a thief according to the law.

To ease your undertanding, the deciding element to determine whether one is a thief under the law is that one must have the intention to appropriate a property by way of permanently deprieve the original owner of his legal rights shall be deemed a thief who is prosecutable under the law.

It was the state of mind of the buyer which shall determine whether he bears a criminal liability or otherwise. If you come in bad faith you are criminal but if you come in good faith you are good people. So hopping back to our argument, if a person who comes in good faith (bona fide purchaser) oblivious to the status quo of a property and reasonably believe that it's a clean (not stolen) property, he shall not be regard as a thief as he has no intention to buy a stolen goods hence do not need to return the stolen property.

After you have been educated by above unprofessional elaboration of how bona fide concept would works, let's apply it to our First Class Judiciary's rational. Now, the law no longers raise the question whether bona fide should determine whether a purchaser right should ever triumph over a careless original owner's right. Bona fide or not bona fide is no longer relevant in todays context. Today, so long as you purchase a property from a thief, you can never be the rightful owner of the property. You're as much a thief the thief who sold you the property. That's it. Period.

It's plain stupid like what I just said earlier. The law now appears to provide greater protection for careless duped owner more than protection for the purchaser who comes in good faith. The injustice created now is far much greater than injustice before. You now have to return a stolen property despite you have bought it with good faith.

The core reason for the sudden overturn of decision from the highest court of the land is not because the existing principle is unsound but because the court is trying to cover-up the loophole currently existing in our land transfer system by deviating the focus away from the fact that our land transfer system is highly inefficent and the government officials do not WORK in clean hands to upheld transparency and accoutability.

What makes you think corruption is not the reason why titles can be forged so easily?

Why penalise the weak for the incompetence caused by your own omission?

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

You heobag!

This is by far the best source for profanity and many great thanks to my delinquent Mr.Ja for sharing his amazing discovery with us. From today onwards, I'm a profanity-learned man. So make sure you don't step on my tail or try to be a pain in the ass to me cause now I have a long list of vulgar words to choose from to spew at you .

I feel so rejuvenated right now for having this newly enhanced capability to smut of mine. Muahaha ....( Pinky finger place at the tip of your lips and evil laugh )




I'm so enjoying this moment!