Yesterday I saw my cousin sister online in the middle of the night which is unorthodox I would say since she's those schedule oriented type of person who would sleep on time because she's a good loving mother who needs to take care her 2 little dragon well-being and her adequate sleep is vital for her. I soon found out it was my cousin brother-in-law using my cousin sister's msn account and being my usual self I'm as sarcastic at my best in the cyberspace ( because you hardly need to be responsible of what you write in the internet as words can be easily misinterpreted without confirming with the writer's facial expression and actual mood )
So I asked my cousin brother-in-law whether has she already went to bed and he said she hasn't and she was standing right behind him monitors our humble conversation. In my sarcastic respond to that I said, "ok...lets us consider she has already slept" as a form of implication I would like to assume that she's invisible at that moment of time.
And falling exactly into the realm of respond I would expect from my sarcasm, whenever I step on her tail making her feel a slight agitation which without a single doubt she would reprimand it with her so much mind-bending non-sensical talk. She said, "You can't consider someone to be asleep or otherwise. Someone is either asleep or not. You can't consider it"
I was seriously dumbstruck at that time. Why can't a person apprehend a simple sarcasm or joke? Was my implication really that hard to understand? It's not a rocket science logic to feel that your presence is unwanted. She really ticks me off. Of course as usual I would try my level best to explain to the senile-zero-humour loving mother of 2 my rational behind my statement.
Yes she may bears a point saying we can't consider whether one is asleep or not. You can't assume a fact ( that she's not asleep yet ) to be otherwise. No argument on this point. But my contention is that I am actually making a figure of speech hence justify for me to undermine the factual position of current situation. I'm not saying you're not asleep but I'm saying I would like to assume you're invisible as it's very hard for me and my cousin brother-in-law to have a guy talk. Therefore I do not find the choice of word I used is illogical. I am merely teling you a metaphore or an expression. What is the fact is the less bit of my consideration. I don't care whether you're asleep or not, I just want you to be not around the monitor screen thats all. *Chuckle*
Of course I know she's reading my blog that's why I'm writing this complain post to continue making her feel agitated and flustered. Muahaha.....
Anyway, the constant incoherent respond I always get from her really grinds my gears. You can't have a relaxed conversation with them. They have to be so adversarial at everytime. Damn pity the husband. How can he survive with her for so long?
Get the joke?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecc41/ecc4161d903f5dd5da896cfa452d6333c375d3fb" alt=""